In rewriting by Joseph Harris he is very specific about how
people should read with a purpose. When a reader does this they can collect the
information and create a paper or “project” from the information. Harris then
describes rewriting as a way to take and article and improve on it, through the
reader/ writers own personal views. This means any article can be rewritten in
many different ways because of the broad variety of views readers can have.
This proves how writing is not just black and white. I think Sullivan proved
this in his article about blogging. Blogging can be written for many different
purposes, as we viewed in class. People write about music, cupcakes, their
lives, and so much more. There is never just one purpose for writing. Readers
can perceive an article in many different ways and all of them could be correct
or have a valuable point. In addition, Harris talks about how many different
applications of writing there can be. Papers can include newspaper articles, educational
papers and much more. Harris also connected to Sullivan when he talked about
writing for a purpose. When writing the author should always have a reason.
Writers want to have a voice and that is something Sullivan reiterated in “why
I blog”. Although Harris’s version of writing is not as informal as blogging
there are many similarities between the two forms of writing. Writing is never
wrong or 100% right it is all in the writer interpretations and own personal
opinions.
This explanation resonated with me more than the book did. The as Sullivan mentioned, blogging is about the instantaneous, and Harris said that writing is about having a purpose. I guess I thought that blogs were frivolous but these authors clearly state that to write, the writer must only be passionate or interested in their chosen topic.
ReplyDelete